Monitoring
This factor indicates that systematic procedures exist for measuring student achievement. Such procedures document achievement in specific areas, establish need for instructional improvement and develop priorities for the allocation of resources. Analysis of the perception data for the MONITORING correlate indicates that the 2.0 level is met by all three groups. The values given to the correlate are: Parents: 1.950 Teachers: 1.787 Administrators: 1.581 Observations: Overall, all three groups hold positive perceptions of processes associated with Monitoring Student Progress, although there is clear concern that teachers do not take attendance and contact parents when children are absent (element D). In light of the perception of high teacher and student absences expressed under the School Climate correlate (see above), it appears the school district should examine its processes for recording and monitoring attendance rates. Overall Patterns: Parents perceive two elements not to be established in the district, and teacher
perceptions are slightly above 2.0 on element D:
Areas of Greatest Effectiveness: All three groups agree that element E is among the most effective elements of Monitoring
Student Progress in the district:
Parents and teachers perceive element C to be among the most effective:
Parents and administrators agree that element F is among the most effective elements:
Teachers and administrators agree that element H is among the most effective elements:
Areas of Greatest Concern: All groups agree that element D is among the least effective elements of Monitoring
Student Progress in the district:
Parents and administrators identify elements B and G as among the least effective
(although both scores achieve effectiveness):
|